Current:Home > FinanceSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -AssetScope
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-28 08:31:27
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (53876)
Related
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- A board leader calls the new Wisconsin wolf plan key to removing federal protections for the animal
- Brooks Robinson, Baseball Hall of Famer and 'Mr. Oriole', dies at 86
- JPMorgan Chase agrees to $75 million settlement in Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking case
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Family of West Virginia 13-year-old who was struck, killed by off-duty deputy demands jury trial
- Michigan judges ordered to honor pronouns of parties in court
- Deion Sanders’ impact at Colorado raises hopes other Black coaches will get opportunities
- 'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
- Zillennials, notorious for work-life balance demands, search for something widely desired
Ranking
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Why Sharon Osbourne Warns Against Ozempic After She Lost 42 Pounds
- Long COVID has affected nearly 7% of American adults, CDC survey data finds
- House Republicans claim to have bank wires from Beijing going to Joe Biden's Delaware address. Hunter Biden's attorney explained why.
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Storms batter Greek island as government prioritizes adapting to the effects of climate change
- Man with boogaloo ties convicted in shooting death of federal officer during protests over George Floyd killing
- A Belgian bishop says the Vatican has for years snubbed pleas to defrock a pedophile ex-colleague
Recommendation
Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
Oregon Gov. Kotek directs state police to crack down on fentanyl distribution
Dancing with the Stars Season 32 Premiere: Find Out Who Was Eliminated
A Jim Crow satire returns to Broadway after 62 years — and it's a romp, not a relic
Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
U.N. says pilot integration program for refugees in Mexico could ease U.S. border crossings
Lou Holtz stands by Ohio State comments after Ryan Day called him out: 'I don't feel bad'
John Legend, 'The Voice' 4-chair 'king,' beats Niall Horan in winning over Mara Justine with duet